<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 639 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173493</link>
    <description>The Court held that the statutory first charge created on the assets of the establishment by Section 11(2) of the EPF Act takes precedence over all types of debts, including those due to secured creditors. The judgment and order of the Company Judge were set aside, and the appellant&#039;s applications were allowed. The Official Liquidator was directed to deposit the provident fund dues payable by the employer within three months, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2016 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 639 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173493</link>
      <description>The Court held that the statutory first charge created on the assets of the establishment by Section 11(2) of the EPF Act takes precedence over all types of debts, including those due to secured creditors. The judgment and order of the Company Judge were set aside, and the appellant&#039;s applications were allowed. The Official Liquidator was directed to deposit the provident fund dues payable by the employer within three months, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>