https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173491 Under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, an eviction proceeding for unauthorized assignment or parting with possession may continue against the assignee even after the original tenant company is dissolved, because the statutory scheme contemplates relief against persons other than the immediate tenant in such cases. The lease clause that merely extends the meanings of "lessee" and "lessor" to assigns and representatives does not amount to consent in writing for the particular assignment. On that reasoning, the majority sustained recovery of possession from the assignee, while the dissent held that dissolution of the tenant company ended the Controller's jurisdiction. en-us Mon, 19 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:24:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173491 Under Section 14(1)(b) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, an eviction proceeding for unauthorized assignment or parting with possession may continue against the assignee even after the original tenant company is dissolved, because the statutory scheme contemplates relief against persons other than the immediate tenant in such cases. The lease clause that merely extends the meanings of "lessee" and "lessor" to assigns and representatives does not amount to consent in writing for the particular assignment. On that reasoning, the majority sustained recovery of possession from the assignee, while the dissent held that dissolution of the tenant company ended the Controller's jurisdiction. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173491