<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 332 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173488</link>
    <description>A police officer&#039;s heavy drinking while on duty, while armed with a service revolver, together with drunken roaming in public and abuse of a medical officer, was treated as gravest misconduct under Rule 16.2(1). The rule was read to permit dismissal for a single act of serious delinquency, because &quot;acts&quot; is not confined to repeated misconduct. The separate reference to continued misconduct, incorrigibility, and pensionary considerations was treated as an independent limb and not as a limitation on the power to dismiss for grave misconduct. Long service and prospective pension did not require a lesser penalty where discipline in a disciplined force was seriously breached.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 332 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173488</link>
      <description>A police officer&#039;s heavy drinking while on duty, while armed with a service revolver, together with drunken roaming in public and abuse of a medical officer, was treated as gravest misconduct under Rule 16.2(1). The rule was read to permit dismissal for a single act of serious delinquency, because &quot;acts&quot; is not confined to repeated misconduct. The separate reference to continued misconduct, incorrigibility, and pensionary considerations was treated as an independent limb and not as a limitation on the power to dismiss for grave misconduct. Long service and prospective pension did not require a lesser penalty where discipline in a disciplined force was seriously breached.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173488</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>