https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173486 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that bagasse and press mud should not be treated as manufactured goods subject to duty. They held that the demands made by the Revenue were not sustainable under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, as bagasse and press mud were considered waste products rather than excisable goods. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue's order, allowing the appeals and waiving the pre-deposit of dues based on legal interpretations and precedents. en-us Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173486 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, determining that bagasse and press mud should not be treated as manufactured goods subject to duty. They held that the demands made by the Revenue were not sustainable under Rule 6 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, as bagasse and press mud were considered waste products rather than excisable goods. The Tribunal set aside the Revenue's order, allowing the appeals and waiving the pre-deposit of dues based on legal interpretations and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 31 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173486