https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the demand for service tax and penalties amounting to approximately Rs. 12 lakhs. It was determined that the appellant's role in the construction project for Air India was that of project management, not consulting engineering services. The contract details specified the appellant's responsibilities for managing the project, coordinating various experts, procurement, and supervision of construction activities. As per the Tribunal's analysis, the appellant's activities aligned more with project management rather than consulting engineering services, leading to the appeal being allowed and the demand for service tax and penalties being set aside. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, overturning the demand for service tax and penalties amounting to approximately Rs. 12 lakhs. It was determined that the appellant's role in the construction project for Air India was that of project management, not consulting engineering services. The contract details specified the appellant's responsibilities for managing the project, coordinating various experts, procurement, and supervision of construction activities. As per the Tribunal's analysis, the appellant's activities aligned more with project management rather than consulting engineering services, leading to the appeal being allowed and the demand for service tax and penalties being set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=294