https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173485 Rule 37D of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 prohibits specified label and advertisement expressions for edible oils and fats, and the residuary words must be read ejusdem generis with those listed expressions. A pictorial depiction of vegetables on a refined soyabean oil label, intended to show possible uses in cooking, did not by itself claim superior quality or exaggerate the product's characteristics. The label therefore did not amount to misbranding and did not violate Rule 37D. en-us Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Nov 2015 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173485 Rule 37D of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 prohibits specified label and advertisement expressions for edible oils and fats, and the residuary words must be read ejusdem generis with those listed expressions. A pictorial depiction of vegetables on a refined soyabean oil label, intended to show possible uses in cooking, did not by itself claim superior quality or exaggerate the product's characteristics. The label therefore did not amount to misbranding and did not violate Rule 37D. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173485