<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1933 (4) TMI 14 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173484</link>
    <description>Section 12(2) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 allows only non-personal, non-capital expenditure incurred solely to earn the income of the relevant year under the residual head of income. An outlay made years earlier on erecting buildings on leased land cannot be carried forward and deducted against later rental income, because the allowance must relate to expenditure incurred in the year in which the assessable income arises. The claimed deduction was therefore not admissible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:06:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1933 (4) TMI 14 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173484</link>
      <description>Section 12(2) of the Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 allows only non-personal, non-capital expenditure incurred solely to earn the income of the relevant year under the residual head of income. An outlay made years earlier on erecting buildings on leased land cannot be carried forward and deducted against later rental income, because the allowance must relate to expenditure incurred in the year in which the assessable income arises. The claimed deduction was therefore not admissible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 1933 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>