<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 227 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173482</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act is a special law regarding the conditions of service enumerated in the schedule. The regulations made by the Electricity Board are of no effect unless notified by the government under Section 13-B or certified by the Certifying Officer under Section 5 of the Act. The regulation regarding the age of superannuation made by the Board and notified by the government was deemed valid, leading to the proper retirement of the respondents at the age of 58 years. The High Court&#039;s writ petition was dismissed, and appellants were awarded costs of Rs. 3,500/- to be paid to the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 227 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173482</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act is a special law regarding the conditions of service enumerated in the schedule. The regulations made by the Electricity Board are of no effect unless notified by the government under Section 13-B or certified by the Certifying Officer under Section 5 of the Act. The regulation regarding the age of superannuation made by the Board and notified by the government was deemed valid, leading to the proper retirement of the respondents at the age of 58 years. The High Court&#039;s writ petition was dismissed, and appellants were awarded costs of Rs. 3,500/- to be paid to the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>