<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (8) TMI 227 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173482</link>
    <description>The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 was held to prevail over the Electricity Board&#039;s general power to frame service regulations under Section 79(c) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 in matters covered by the Standing Orders Act, because the special statute overrides the general provision. Section 13-B was construed as extending beyond Government industrial establishments to statutory corporations where notified rules or regulations govern workmen, and the exclusion under that provision operates only to the extent of the field actually covered by the notification. On that basis, the notified superannuation rule at 58 years was effective and the workmen&#039;s retirement was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 16:00:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (8) TMI 227 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173482</link>
      <description>The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 was held to prevail over the Electricity Board&#039;s general power to frame service regulations under Section 79(c) of the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 in matters covered by the Standing Orders Act, because the special statute overrides the general provision. Section 13-B was construed as extending beyond Government industrial establishments to statutory corporations where notified rules or regulations govern workmen, and the exclusion under that provision operates only to the extent of the field actually covered by the notification. On that basis, the notified superannuation rule at 58 years was effective and the workmen&#039;s retirement was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>