<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 2 - CESTAT - New Delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellants&#039; activities constituted a taxable service within the realm of advertising agency services under Section 65(90)(e). As the appellants were found to be providing advertising agency services through manufacturing, installation, and display of signages, the appeal was dismissed. The judgment was pronounced in open court, affirming that the appellants&#039; actions were subject to service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 2 - CESTAT - New Delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the appellants&#039; activities constituted a taxable service within the realm of advertising agency services under Section 65(90)(e). As the appellants were found to be providing advertising agency services through manufacturing, installation, and display of signages, the appeal was dismissed. The judgment was pronounced in open court, affirming that the appellants&#039; actions were subject to service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>