https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173478 Preventive detention was upheld where the record showed armed threats, property damage, panic in a busy locality, and a continuing pattern of conduct affecting public order rather than a mere law-and-order breach. The challenge based on alleged non-application of mind to bail status failed because the materials showed bail was considered and no prejudice was demonstrated. The plea that the detention was illegal for non-consideration of the representation and reliance on earlier incidents also failed, as the representation had been considered and the prior incidents were proximate, not stale. The detention order was therefore sustained. en-us Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2019 11:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173478 Preventive detention was upheld where the record showed armed threats, property damage, panic in a busy locality, and a continuing pattern of conduct affecting public order rather than a mere law-and-order breach. The challenge based on alleged non-application of mind to bail status failed because the materials showed bail was considered and no prejudice was demonstrated. The plea that the detention was illegal for non-consideration of the representation and reliance on earlier incidents also failed, as the representation had been considered and the prior incidents were proximate, not stale. The detention order was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173478