https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173476 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, ruling that there was no unusual delay in passing or executing the detention order. The Supreme Court emphasized that a single significant incident could justify detention based on its impact, not the number of incidents. It also found that the representations were properly considered and rejected with independent application of mind by the Central Government. The Supreme Court directed the Detaining Authority to reassess the need for further detention within a month and serve the order on the detenu. The appeal was allowed and resolved accordingly. en-us Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173476 The Supreme Court overturned the High Court's decision, ruling that there was no unusual delay in passing or executing the detention order. The Supreme Court emphasized that a single significant incident could justify detention based on its impact, not the number of incidents. It also found that the representations were properly considered and rejected with independent application of mind by the Central Government. The Supreme Court directed the Detaining Authority to reassess the need for further detention within a month and serve the order on the detenu. The appeal was allowed and resolved accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173476