https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173475 The Supreme Court upheld the detention order issued under Section 3(1) of the COFEPOSA Act, rejecting challenges related to the detenue's status as an NRI, delay in considering representations, non-supply of documents to the Advisory Board, and alleged prejudice due to missing materials. The Court found the detention order valid despite concerns about the timeliness of proceedings and the freshness of evidence. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of due process and the sufficiency of grounds for detention. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173475 The Supreme Court upheld the detention order issued under Section 3(1) of the COFEPOSA Act, rejecting challenges related to the detenue's status as an NRI, delay in considering representations, non-supply of documents to the Advisory Board, and alleged prejudice due to missing materials. The Court found the detention order valid despite concerns about the timeliness of proceedings and the freshness of evidence. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the importance of due process and the sufficiency of grounds for detention. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173475