https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173475 A preventive detention order is not invalidated by a slight delay in forwarding some records to the Advisory Board where the materials were before it in time and no prejudice is shown. Prompt consideration of a representation is required, but delay caused by obtaining translation was satisfactorily explained and did not vitiate the detention. Non-placement of an immaterial third-party statement did not affect subjective satisfaction, and the order could in any event stand on severable grounds. The allegations of stale material and NRI status were rejected on the record, so the detention was upheld. en-us Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173475 A preventive detention order is not invalidated by a slight delay in forwarding some records to the Advisory Board where the materials were before it in time and no prejudice is shown. Prompt consideration of a representation is required, but delay caused by obtaining translation was satisfactorily explained and did not vitiate the detention. Non-placement of an immaterial third-party statement did not affect subjective satisfaction, and the order could in any event stand on severable grounds. The allegations of stale material and NRI status were rejected on the record, so the detention was upheld. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 24 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173475