<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants to adjust excess Service Tax payments against short payments in accordance with Rule 7 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The decision emphasized the procedural requirements for assessing and adjusting payments, ultimately setting aside the demand for short payments made by the Commissioner (Appeals). The ruling underscored the assessees&#039; obligations to rectify deficiencies or seek refunds as outlined in the applicable provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 8 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellants to adjust excess Service Tax payments against short payments in accordance with Rule 7 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The decision emphasized the procedural requirements for assessing and adjusting payments, ultimately setting aside the demand for short payments made by the Commissioner (Appeals). The ruling underscored the assessees&#039; obligations to rectify deficiencies or seek refunds as outlined in the applicable provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>