https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173472 A transfer order made by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge was valid because he had competence to make over sessions cases, even though the order cited the wrong statutory provision. A mere incorrect recital of the source of power did not vitiate an otherwise sustainable order, and the receiving VIth Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge therefore had jurisdiction to try the case. The High Court was wrong to set aside the conviction on that jurisdictional ground, and the conviction and sentence stood. en-us Mon, 12 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:53:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173472 A transfer order made by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge was valid because he had competence to make over sessions cases, even though the order cited the wrong statutory provision. A mere incorrect recital of the source of power did not vitiate an otherwise sustainable order, and the receiving VIth Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge therefore had jurisdiction to try the case. The High Court was wrong to set aside the conviction on that jurisdictional ground, and the conviction and sentence stood. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Nov 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173472