<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 256 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173467</link>
    <description>Preventive detention is not vitiated where the detenu&#039;s representation is considered promptly and any delay is reasonably explained. A detention order is also not invalidated by non-placement of a document if the omitted reply is materially the same as a statement already before the detaining authority and was not relied on in forming subjective satisfaction. Delay in passing the detention order does not by itself vitiate detention unless it breaks the live link between the prejudicial activity and the order; here, the explanation showed the detenu was abroad, so no infirmity was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:40:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397545" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 256 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173467</link>
      <description>Preventive detention is not vitiated where the detenu&#039;s representation is considered promptly and any delay is reasonably explained. A detention order is also not invalidated by non-placement of a document if the omitted reply is materially the same as a statement already before the detaining authority and was not relied on in forming subjective satisfaction. Delay in passing the detention order does not by itself vitiate detention unless it breaks the live link between the prejudicial activity and the order; here, the explanation showed the detenu was abroad, so no infirmity was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>