https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173461 Preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act was held invalid where the detenu's recent bail order was not placed before, or shown to be within the knowledge of, the detaining authority. The bail order was treated as vital material for forming subjective satisfaction because a person at liberty on bail stands on a different footing from one in custody. The Court also noted that the earlier incidents relied upon were too remote in time to sustain detention. On that basis, the detention order could not be upheld and the challenge succeeded. en-us Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Oct 2015 17:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173461 Preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act was held invalid where the detenu's recent bail order was not placed before, or shown to be within the knowledge of, the detaining authority. The bail order was treated as vital material for forming subjective satisfaction because a person at liberty on bail stands on a different footing from one in custody. The Court also noted that the earlier incidents relied upon were too remote in time to sustain detention. On that basis, the detention order could not be upheld and the challenge succeeded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173461