<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (9) TMI 1046 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173455</link>
    <description>In preventive detention under COFEPOSA, the detaining authority must be supplied with all materially relevant documents bearing on its subjective satisfaction before issuing the order. The detenu&#039;s reply to the Customs show cause notice was vital because it directly addressed the circumstances used to infer smuggling involvement, and its omission could affect the authority&#039;s decision one way or the other. Post facto reference to that reply in an affidavit did not cure the defect, and the failure also impaired the detenu&#039;s right to an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. Non-consideration of such vital material renders the detention unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 09:45:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (9) TMI 1046 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173455</link>
      <description>In preventive detention under COFEPOSA, the detaining authority must be supplied with all materially relevant documents bearing on its subjective satisfaction before issuing the order. The detenu&#039;s reply to the Customs show cause notice was vital because it directly addressed the circumstances used to infer smuggling involvement, and its omission could affect the authority&#039;s decision one way or the other. Post facto reference to that reply in an affidavit did not cure the defect, and the failure also impaired the detenu&#039;s right to an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution. Non-consideration of such vital material renders the detention unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>