https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264066 The judgment addressed the extension of stay granted, the difference of opinion in the Division Bench, the constitution of a Larger Bench, the power of the Hon'ble President CESTAT, and the issue of admissibility of Cenvat credit on telecom towers. It clarified the procedure for resolving differences of opinion and highlighted the discretionary powers of the President in constituting benches. Ultimately, it was decided that a Larger Bench should resolve the difference of opinion, allowing the appeals to be heard efficiently. en-us Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264066 The judgment addressed the extension of stay granted, the difference of opinion in the Division Bench, the constitution of a Larger Bench, the power of the Hon'ble President CESTAT, and the issue of admissibility of Cenvat credit on telecom towers. It clarified the procedure for resolving differences of opinion and highlighted the discretionary powers of the President in constituting benches. Ultimately, it was decided that a Larger Bench should resolve the difference of opinion, allowing the appeals to be heard efficiently. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 30 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264066