<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 732 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264064</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of service tax under reverse charge against textile manufacturers for commission paid to overseas agents, granting them exemption under Notification No.14/2004-ST for export promotion activities related to textile goods. The decision favored the appellants, allowing cenvat credit on service tax paid under reverse charge to maintain competitiveness in the overseas market. Penalties were rejected due to lack of deliberate evasion and the demand being time-barred. The judgment provided a detailed analysis supporting the appellants&#039; eligibility for exemption and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 732 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264064</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of service tax under reverse charge against textile manufacturers for commission paid to overseas agents, granting them exemption under Notification No.14/2004-ST for export promotion activities related to textile goods. The decision favored the appellants, allowing cenvat credit on service tax paid under reverse charge to maintain competitiveness in the overseas market. Penalties were rejected due to lack of deliberate evasion and the demand being time-barred. The judgment provided a detailed analysis supporting the appellants&#039; eligibility for exemption and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>