https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264063 The Tribunal upheld the requirement of mandatory pre-deposit for appeals filed after 6-8-2014 under the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that the amendment did not unduly restrict the right to appeal, as the deposit requirement remained consistent with pre-amendment conditions. The Tribunal ruled that CESTAT cannot entertain appeals without the mandatory pre-deposit post-amendment, emphasizing compliance with the law. The judgment was pronounced on 26-2-2015. en-us Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264063 The Tribunal upheld the requirement of mandatory pre-deposit for appeals filed after 6-8-2014 under the amended Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that the amendment did not unduly restrict the right to appeal, as the deposit requirement remained consistent with pre-amendment conditions. The Tribunal ruled that CESTAT cannot entertain appeals without the mandatory pre-deposit post-amendment, emphasizing compliance with the law. The judgment was pronounced on 26-2-2015. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 26 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264063