<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264055</link>
    <description>The High Court found merit in the appeals, noting the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adequately address the liability for interest on delayed duty payment. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the violation of natural justice and remanding the matter to the Tribunal. Consequently, the Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s final order and remanding the case for further consideration, with the appellant undertaking not to seek further adjournments. The Tribunal was directed to schedule a hearing, preferably in October 2015, with the appellant&#039;s cooperation, and the original records were to be returned for the appeals&#039; disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 723 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264055</link>
      <description>The High Court found merit in the appeals, noting the Tribunal&#039;s failure to adequately address the liability for interest on delayed duty payment. The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order due to the violation of natural justice and remanding the matter to the Tribunal. Consequently, the Court allowed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s final order and remanding the case for further consideration, with the appellant undertaking not to seek further adjournments. The Tribunal was directed to schedule a hearing, preferably in October 2015, with the appellant&#039;s cooperation, and the original records were to be returned for the appeals&#039; disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264055</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>