<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 721 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on items like Cement, Angles, Channels used in foundation work and support structures for machinery before the 2009 amendment. The demand for the period before the amendment was considered time-barred, and the appeal was allowed. As for the period after the amendment, since the Appellant had already reversed the CENVAT Credit, the penalty imposed was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 06:49:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 721 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on items like Cement, Angles, Channels used in foundation work and support structures for machinery before the 2009 amendment. The demand for the period before the amendment was considered time-barred, and the appeal was allowed. As for the period after the amendment, since the Appellant had already reversed the CENVAT Credit, the penalty imposed was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>