<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 716 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264048</link>
    <description>The government allowed the Revision Application, overturning the impugned order-in-appeal, as the applicant&#039;s claim for brand rate fixation based on BCD paid through DEPB scrip was not supported by the relevant notifications and circulars. The decision was in line with the legal interpretations and precedents regarding duty drawback entitlements and payment methods, emphasizing the strict adherence to statutory provisions and specific criteria for benefit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 06:48:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 716 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264048</link>
      <description>The government allowed the Revision Application, overturning the impugned order-in-appeal, as the applicant&#039;s claim for brand rate fixation based on BCD paid through DEPB scrip was not supported by the relevant notifications and circulars. The decision was in line with the legal interpretations and precedents regarding duty drawback entitlements and payment methods, emphasizing the strict adherence to statutory provisions and specific criteria for benefit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>