<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (11) TMI 1 - CESTAT - Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT - Chennai, upholding penalties and interest imposed on the appellants for delay in payment of service tax and filing of service tax returns. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments for exoneration from penalties due to financial crisis, stating financial hardships do not qualify as a reasonable cause. The matter was remanded for the correction of interest calculation errors for a specific period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (11) TMI 1 - CESTAT - Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT - Chennai, upholding penalties and interest imposed on the appellants for delay in payment of service tax and filing of service tax returns. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments for exoneration from penalties due to financial crisis, stating financial hardships do not qualify as a reasonable cause. The matter was remanded for the correction of interest calculation errors for a specific period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>