https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264047 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's decision to reject the actual cost of 4ADPA sourced from a non-market economy for determining the normal value of 6PPD. It found that the international price of 4ADPA from a market economy country was a fair basis for valuation. However, the Tribunal ruled that the Authority violated principles of natural justice by not adequately disclosing the basis for adopting alternate values and methodology for cost computation. The Authority was directed to disclose the international price of 4ADPA, methodology used, and conduct a post-decisional hearing to re-determine pricing, with the process to be completed within six months. en-us Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264047 The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's decision to reject the actual cost of 4ADPA sourced from a non-market economy for determining the normal value of 6PPD. It found that the international price of 4ADPA from a market economy country was a fair basis for valuation. However, the Tribunal ruled that the Authority violated principles of natural justice by not adequately disclosing the basis for adopting alternate values and methodology for cost computation. The Authority was directed to disclose the international price of 4ADPA, methodology used, and conduct a post-decisional hearing to re-determine pricing, with the process to be completed within six months. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264047