https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173447 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing the appellants' diligent pursuit of the case and ruling that they should not be penalized for their counsel's unavailability. The Court also overturned the rejection of the restoration application, noting the absence of delays by the appellants and directing them to pay costs to the respondent within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeals. The High Court was instructed to expedite the writ petition's disposal upon the appellants' cost payment. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Oct 2015 09:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173447 The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's dismissal of a writ petition for non-prosecution, emphasizing the appellants' diligent pursuit of the case and ruling that they should not be penalized for their counsel's unavailability. The Court also overturned the rejection of the restoration application, noting the absence of delays by the appellants and directing them to pay costs to the respondent within a specified timeframe. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeals. The High Court was instructed to expedite the writ petition's disposal upon the appellants' cost payment. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173447