<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 696 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173440</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-examination of input credit admissibility due to the appellant&#039;s failure to file a schedule at the adjudication stage. The appellant was granted a fair opportunity to present their defense, with instructions to submit relevant documents within 8 weeks. This decision aimed to ensure all evidence was considered for a just outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 696 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173440</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case to the Adjudicating Authority for re-examination of input credit admissibility due to the appellant&#039;s failure to file a schedule at the adjudication stage. The appellant was granted a fair opportunity to present their defense, with instructions to submit relevant documents within 8 weeks. This decision aimed to ensure all evidence was considered for a just outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173440</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>