<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 6 - CESTAT , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the confirmation of service tax liability as a consignment agent but set aside the liability as a dealer agent under the category of clearing and forwarding agent, citing legal justification from case law precedent. The Tribunal aligned with the decision that no service tax is payable on commission received by a dealer agent for Del Credere Agency. Penalty under Section 76 of the service tax was deemed unjustified when tax was paid before the show cause notice, leading to the penalty imposition being set aside. The assessee&#039;s appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 6 - CESTAT , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the confirmation of service tax liability as a consignment agent but set aside the liability as a dealer agent under the category of clearing and forwarding agent, citing legal justification from case law precedent. The Tribunal aligned with the decision that no service tax is payable on commission received by a dealer agent for Del Credere Agency. Penalty under Section 76 of the service tax was deemed unjustified when tax was paid before the show cause notice, leading to the penalty imposition being set aside. The assessee&#039;s appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the Revenue&#039;s appeal for penalty enhancement being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>