<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 630 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173414</link>
    <description>Mere possession of a foreign passport does not by itself contravene the Passports Act unless there is departure from India or an attempt to depart, because liability under Section 12 depends on breach of the departure control in Section 3. By contrast, unauthorised possession of a revolver and live cartridges in a notified area attracts the special anti-terror law, since Section 5 creates a rebuttable presumption that such arms were intended for terrorist or disruptive activity. The presence of an Arms Act offence does not displace the aggravated offence under the special statute where the presumption is not rebutted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2017 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 630 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173414</link>
      <description>Mere possession of a foreign passport does not by itself contravene the Passports Act unless there is departure from India or an attempt to depart, because liability under Section 12 depends on breach of the departure control in Section 3. By contrast, unauthorised possession of a revolver and live cartridges in a notified area attracts the special anti-terror law, since Section 5 creates a rebuttable presumption that such arms were intended for terrorist or disruptive activity. The presence of an Arms Act offence does not displace the aggravated offence under the special statute where the presumption is not rebutted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>