<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 2 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal allowing a Service Tax refund to an engineering firm for a turnkey project involving a Coca Cola Bottling Plant. The Tribunal affirmed that the services obtained by the firm were not subject to Service Tax as argued by the Revenue, citing previous Tribunal and Supreme Court decisions that turnkey projects are not liable to Service Tax under consulting engineering services. The Appeal was dismissed, and the firm&#039;s cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 2 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Order-in-Appeal allowing a Service Tax refund to an engineering firm for a turnkey project involving a Coca Cola Bottling Plant. The Tribunal affirmed that the services obtained by the firm were not subject to Service Tax as argued by the Revenue, citing previous Tribunal and Supreme Court decisions that turnkey projects are not liable to Service Tax under consulting engineering services. The Appeal was dismissed, and the firm&#039;s cross objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>