<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 875 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173401</link>
    <description>Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash criminal proceedings in a manner that effectively reopens or nullifies an order framing charge which has already attained finality, including where that order has been upheld up to the Supreme Court. Section 362 bars review or alteration of a signed judgment or final order except for clerical or arithmetical correction, and the inherent power is confined to rare cases to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Where the earlier order was final, the High Court could not invoke inherent powers to undo that concluded position, and the quashing order was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 875 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173401</link>
      <description>Section 482 CrPC cannot be used to quash criminal proceedings in a manner that effectively reopens or nullifies an order framing charge which has already attained finality, including where that order has been upheld up to the Supreme Court. Section 362 bars review or alteration of a signed judgment or final order except for clerical or arithmetical correction, and the inherent power is confined to rare cases to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice. Where the earlier order was final, the High Court could not invoke inherent powers to undo that concluded position, and the quashing order was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>