<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 651 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173399</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, after which the SC found no reason to interfere with the impugned decision and dismissed the civil appeal. The order records only the procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle on Central Excise.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:29:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 651 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173399</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, after which the SC found no reason to interfere with the impugned decision and dismissed the civil appeal. The order records only the procedural outcome and does not set out any substantive legal principle on Central Excise.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>