<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 687 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264019</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim based on limitation grounds. It was established that the refund claims were filed within the required time frame based on the date of foreign exchange realization, in accordance with relevant legal provisions. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for compliance with prescribed procedures and timelines for claiming refunds under the applicable rules and notifications, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:18:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 687 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264019</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the refund claim based on limitation grounds. It was established that the refund claims were filed within the required time frame based on the date of foreign exchange realization, in accordance with relevant legal provisions. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity for compliance with prescribed procedures and timelines for claiming refunds under the applicable rules and notifications, ensuring a fair outcome for the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264019</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>