<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 669 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264001</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to release the bank guarantee and issue consequential orders within two weeks. The decision emphasized compliance with statutory timelines and the importance of issuing necessary orders under the Customs Act. The judgment was based on the assurance given by the respondent&#039;s counsel regarding the release of the bank guarantee in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:16:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 669 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264001</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to release the bank guarantee and issue consequential orders within two weeks. The decision emphasized compliance with statutory timelines and the importance of issuing necessary orders under the Customs Act. The judgment was based on the assurance given by the respondent&#039;s counsel regarding the release of the bank guarantee in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=264001</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>