<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 319 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the penalty on M/s. J.S. Architect Pvt. Ltd. for late service tax deposit and late filing of the return. The circumstances of the Director&#039;s close relative&#039;s serious illness were deemed a reasonable cause for the delay, falling under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Despite the delayed payment, the entire service tax was eventually paid with interest, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 May 2017 16:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39722" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 319 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside the penalty on M/s. J.S. Architect Pvt. Ltd. for late service tax deposit and late filing of the return. The circumstances of the Director&#039;s close relative&#039;s serious illness were deemed a reasonable cause for the delay, falling under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. Despite the delayed payment, the entire service tax was eventually paid with interest, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>