<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 641 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263973</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the valuation of stock in trade at market price upon dissolution of the firm, emphasizing the importance of determining accurate profits or losses. The ITAT found the monetary consideration received by outgoing partners taxable, citing legal precedents and rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments. The ITAT approved the CIT(A)&#039;s order, noting the relevance of case laws in determining the valuation method and dismissing the appeal on all grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2015 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 641 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263973</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision regarding the valuation of stock in trade at market price upon dissolution of the firm, emphasizing the importance of determining accurate profits or losses. The ITAT found the monetary consideration received by outgoing partners taxable, citing legal precedents and rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments. The ITAT approved the CIT(A)&#039;s order, noting the relevance of case laws in determining the valuation method and dismissing the appeal on all grounds raised by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>