<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (3) TMI 607 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173386</link>
    <description>A non-resident enterprise is taxable in the source State only if it has a permanent establishment there, and a solicitation agent becomes a permanent establishment only when it habitually exercises authority to conclude contracts in the foreign enterprise&#039;s name. On the facts, the Indian company acted as a solicitation and collection agent, but final acceptance of advertisement contracts remained with the Mauritian enterprise, so a permanent establishment was not established. Treaty relief under the business profits article was also made conditional on proof that the applicant was a taxable resident of Mauritius and actually liable to income-tax there, rather than exempt as an offshore entity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 17:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (3) TMI 607 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173386</link>
      <description>A non-resident enterprise is taxable in the source State only if it has a permanent establishment there, and a solicitation agent becomes a permanent establishment only when it habitually exercises authority to conclude contracts in the foreign enterprise&#039;s name. On the facts, the Indian company acted as a solicitation and collection agent, but final acceptance of advertisement contracts remained with the Mauritian enterprise, so a permanent establishment was not established. Treaty relief under the business profits article was also made conditional on proof that the applicant was a taxable resident of Mauritius and actually liable to income-tax there, rather than exempt as an offshore entity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>