<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (5) TMI 806 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173383</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court in Citation allowed the respondent to file a reply affidavit within four weeks after condoning the delay in a High Court Reference (CEA No. 118/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY dated 26/08/2009). Justices Mr. D.K. Jain and Mr. C.K. Prasad presided over the case. The petitioner was represented by Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, A.G., and others, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Ashok H Desai, Sr. Adv., and others.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (5) TMI 806 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173383</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court in Citation allowed the respondent to file a reply affidavit within four weeks after condoning the delay in a High Court Reference (CEA No. 118/2007 of The HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY dated 26/08/2009). Justices Mr. D.K. Jain and Mr. C.K. Prasad presided over the case. The petitioner was represented by Mr. G.E. Vahanvati, A.G., and others, while the respondent was represented by Mr. Ashok H Desai, Sr. Adv., and others.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>