https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the impugned order that confirmed a service tax demand of Rs. 8,38,246/- with interest under Section 75 of the Act. Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were imposed but later set aside by the Commissioner, a decision not challenged by the Revenue. The appellants' argument of lack of awareness of their service tax liability post-registration was rejected, leading to the Tribunal upholding the decision due to their failure to contest the liability. The judgment emphasizes the importance of complying with tax obligations once registered, highlighting that ignorance of tax liability is not a valid defense. en-us Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 May 2017 16:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255 The appeal was dismissed, affirming the impugned order that confirmed a service tax demand of Rs. 8,38,246/- with interest under Section 75 of the Act. Penalties under Sections 76 and 77 were imposed but later set aside by the Commissioner, a decision not challenged by the Revenue. The appellants' argument of lack of awareness of their service tax liability post-registration was rejected, leading to the Tribunal upholding the decision due to their failure to contest the liability. The judgment emphasizes the importance of complying with tax obligations once registered, highlighting that ignorance of tax liability is not a valid defense. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=255