https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173379 The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal against the reinstatement of a veterinary assistant, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions in disciplinary matters. The Court held that re-opening disciplinary proceedings after exoneration and reinstatement without specific authority is impermissible, highlighting that once a case is closed and an employee is reinstated, the government cannot initiate a second inquiry without proper legal basis. The High Court's decision granting relief to the employee was upheld, underscoring the need for procedural regularity in such cases. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173379 The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal against the reinstatement of a veterinary assistant, emphasizing the importance of adhering to legal provisions in disciplinary matters. The Court held that re-opening disciplinary proceedings after exoneration and reinstatement without specific authority is impermissible, highlighting that once a case is closed and an employee is reinstated, the government cannot initiate a second inquiry without proper legal basis. The High Court's decision granting relief to the employee was upheld, underscoring the need for procedural regularity in such cases. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173379