<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1980 (4) TMI 306 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173378</link>
    <description>Rule 3 of the All India Services (Conditions of Service-Residuary Matters) Rules, 1960 was treated as a relaxation power meant to address undue hardship in unforeseen cases and to advance justice in the public interest; on that basis, it was held to be supported by the statutory scheme and not arbitrary or violative of Article 14. The Court also distinguished quasi-judicial decisions from purely administrative orders and held that review power need not be expressly conferred for administrative action, since government may revise such decisions subject to statutory limits, natural justice where rights are affected, and judicial review. The challenge therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1980 (4) TMI 306 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173378</link>
      <description>Rule 3 of the All India Services (Conditions of Service-Residuary Matters) Rules, 1960 was treated as a relaxation power meant to address undue hardship in unforeseen cases and to advance justice in the public interest; on that basis, it was held to be supported by the statutory scheme and not arbitrary or violative of Article 14. The Court also distinguished quasi-judicial decisions from purely administrative orders and held that review power need not be expressly conferred for administrative action, since government may revise such decisions subject to statutory limits, natural justice where rights are affected, and judicial review. The challenge therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 1980 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173378</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>