https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173375 The appellant faced preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act and property forfeiture under SAFEMA, which was later canceled. Disputes arose over property ownership and transfer, with allegations of forgery. The High Court dismissed the appellant's petition due to factual disputes and advised seeking relief elsewhere. The Division Bench refused to allow withdrawal of the appeal, emphasizing the seriousness of the case. The judgment stressed access to justice and the right to fair trial, highlighting the importance of pursuing remedies through appropriate legal channels. en-us Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173375 The appellant faced preventive detention under the COFEPOSA Act and property forfeiture under SAFEMA, which was later canceled. Disputes arose over property ownership and transfer, with allegations of forgery. The High Court dismissed the appellant's petition due to factual disputes and advised seeking relief elsewhere. The Division Bench refused to allow withdrawal of the appeal, emphasizing the seriousness of the case. The judgment stressed access to justice and the right to fair trial, highlighting the importance of pursuing remedies through appropriate legal channels. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 05 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173375