<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 1 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. One lakh under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for delayed payment of service tax, as the appellants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause under Section 80. Additionally, the Tribunal limited the penalty under Section 77 to Rs. 2,000/- for delayed filing of returns, aligning with historical penalty amounts. The appellants&#039; appeal was disposed of, affirming the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 1 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty of Rs. One lakh under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, for delayed payment of service tax, as the appellants failed to demonstrate sufficient cause under Section 80. Additionally, the Tribunal limited the penalty under Section 77 to Rs. 2,000/- for delayed filing of returns, aligning with historical penalty amounts. The appellants&#039; appeal was disposed of, affirming the penalties imposed by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>