<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 1379 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173365</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking suspension of conviction for a public servant convicted of corruption during the pendency of his appeal in the High Court. The Court emphasized that allowing convicted public servants to hold office could undermine public confidence and demoralize honest public servants. It clarified that the power to suspend a conviction should be sparingly used, especially in cases involving corruption by public servants. The Court highlighted the need to prioritize public interest and integrity of public institutions over individual concerns, suggesting the appellant seek an early appeal hearing if there were valid grounds for exoneration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:47:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 1379 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173365</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal seeking suspension of conviction for a public servant convicted of corruption during the pendency of his appeal in the High Court. The Court emphasized that allowing convicted public servants to hold office could undermine public confidence and demoralize honest public servants. It clarified that the power to suspend a conviction should be sparingly used, especially in cases involving corruption by public servants. The Court highlighted the need to prioritize public interest and integrity of public institutions over individual concerns, suggesting the appellant seek an early appeal hearing if there were valid grounds for exoneration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173365</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>