<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (12) TMI 88 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173364</link>
    <description>The court upheld the cancellation of the excess allotment made to the appellants&#039; father, emphasizing the validity of the jurisdiction of the Section Officer-cum-Managing Officer and the Chief Settlement Commissioner. The court found the revenue records from Pakistan to be reliable and concluded that the appellants failed to provide contrary evidence. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the court found no illegality or impropriety in the orders passed by the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:12:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (12) TMI 88 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173364</link>
      <description>The court upheld the cancellation of the excess allotment made to the appellants&#039; father, emphasizing the validity of the jurisdiction of the Section Officer-cum-Managing Officer and the Chief Settlement Commissioner. The court found the revenue records from Pakistan to be reliable and concluded that the appellants failed to provide contrary evidence. The appeal was dismissed with costs, and the court found no illegality or impropriety in the orders passed by the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>