https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173360 A tenant's induction of a dealer into possession was treated as subletting because the tenant had parted with possession, the dealer was not shown to be a mere licensee or to hold for the tenant, and the arrangement involved fixed payments. An unregistered lease deed could not be relied on to prove authority to sublet where the permission formed part of the lease transaction and was not severable as a collateral purpose. The clause also did not amount to the landlord's specific written consent to the particular subletting required by the rent control scheme, so the eviction ground for subletting without consent was made out. en-us Tue, 08 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:42:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173360 A tenant's induction of a dealer into possession was treated as subletting because the tenant had parted with possession, the dealer was not shown to be a mere licensee or to hold for the tenant, and the arrangement involved fixed payments. An unregistered lease deed could not be relied on to prove authority to sublet where the permission formed part of the lease transaction and was not severable as a collateral purpose. The clause also did not amount to the landlord's specific written consent to the particular subletting required by the rent control scheme, so the eviction ground for subletting without consent was made out. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 08 Aug 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=173360