<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 636 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263968</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeals after considering the second substantial question of law in both appeals. Relying on a previous decision, the Court found that the ratio laid down in that case applied equally to the present appeals. Consequently, the second substantial question of law was answered in favor of the respective assessee/respondent and against the Revenue/appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 636 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263968</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeals after considering the second substantial question of law in both appeals. Relying on a previous decision, the Court found that the ratio laid down in that case applied equally to the present appeals. Consequently, the second substantial question of law was answered in favor of the respective assessee/respondent and against the Revenue/appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263968</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>