https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263964 The Tribunal granted condonation of the 280-day delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to correspondence delays. The demand for service tax on renting immovable property and sale of space was contested, with the appellant arguing that the full amount had been recovered by Revenue Authorities. Penalties imposed were set aside, citing eligibility for Section 80 benefits. The appellant agreed to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe to comply with jurisdictional authorities. Failure to comply would revive the impugned orders. Both appeals were disposed of under these terms. en-us Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:00:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263964 The Tribunal granted condonation of the 280-day delay in filing the appeal, attributing it to correspondence delays. The demand for service tax on renting immovable property and sale of space was contested, with the appellant arguing that the full amount had been recovered by Revenue Authorities. Penalties imposed were set aside, citing eligibility for Section 80 benefits. The appellant agreed to deposit a specified amount within a timeframe to comply with jurisdictional authorities. Failure to comply would revive the impugned orders. Both appeals were disposed of under these terms. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263964