<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 631 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263963</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the re-assessment orders under the KVAT Act for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The matter was remitted back to the assessing officer for re-adjudication of the input tax credit claims. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to prove the legitimacy of the claimed credits, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and the importance of a fair hearing before disallowing such claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2015 07:00:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 631 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263963</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the re-assessment orders under the KVAT Act for the years 2010-11 and 2011-12. The matter was remitted back to the assessing officer for re-adjudication of the input tax credit claims. The petitioner was granted the opportunity to prove the legitimacy of the claimed credits, emphasizing compliance with statutory provisions and the importance of a fair hearing before disallowing such claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>