<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 623 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263955</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for alleged involvement in the diversion of raw materials by the main noticee. The tribunal found no concrete evidence implicating the appellant in the diversion and emphasized the lack of justification for penalizing the appellant based on assumptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=397124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 623 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263955</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the penalty imposed on the appellant under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, for alleged involvement in the diversion of raw materials by the main noticee. The tribunal found no concrete evidence implicating the appellant in the diversion and emphasized the lack of justification for penalizing the appellant based on assumptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>